Copyright 2004-2008

  • David Gottlieb. All rights reserved.
Blog powered by TypePad

« December 2007 | Main | February 2008 »

It's Expensive to Be Jewish. Exhibit A: My Tefillin

Cross-posted on Jews By Choice

About a decade ago, when we moved back to the Chicago area and joined a traditional Conservative synagogue, it soon became apparent that I was going to have to buy tefillin. I had never worn tefillin, can't tie a knot to save my life, and wasn't at all sure why or whether this strange behavior was necessary.

But if I was going to attend a morning minyan -- as I was told every good Jew should do (even if you're a woman and not counted in the minyan) -- then I needed tefillin. So a friend took me to a large, reputable Jewish bookstore in Chicago that also sells the requisite storehouse of mandatory Jewish paraphernalia, and I purchased a set.

I have used this set perhaps two dozen times in the decade that I've owned it. First, I was too shy to actually go a morning minyan and be seen accidentally lashed to my chair, murmuring for help. The first few times I did go to minyan, I went half an hour early. This would have been an excellent way to meditate one's way into prayer, but in my case I was just trying to not wind up hanged from the rafters by the straps of the arm tefillin.

Laying tefillin should be a meditation: when you do it, you're preparing for prayer, but you're also physically attaching crucial sets of text your body: you're demarcating the boundary of your physical self with text that cleaves your soul to the transcendental. You are bound into mystical union with the Almighty, embossed (via the letters on the head tefillin and the shin formed by the straps of the arm tefillin as they cross the back of your hand) with one of the Divine names that's loaded with mystical meaning.

You're starting the day with the recitation of prayer accompanied by the continuity of preparation that has existed for thousands of years. To watch someone lay tefillin when they've done it every day all their lives -- to see them muttering the verse assigned to each move of the choreography, and to see how beautifully and evenly they execute each movement -- is to come face-to-face with the ancient truth that laying tefillin is the very essence of the committed religious life: utter nonsense transformed into transcendent meaning. And still managing to be both nonsensical and transcendent at once.

The tefillin contain four sets of verses from the Torah, laid out in parallel rows. These verses must be written in ink, in a specific type of script, on parchment, and calligraphed and knotted to the rigorous and exacting standards that have driven many a Sofer (scribe) round the bend. These four verses are inserted in the arm tefillin's one compartment, and then inserted separately in the four compartments of the tefillin worn on the head.

I'm telling you all this because, in preparation for Gabe's bar mitzvah later this year, we're preparing to buy him his first set of tefillin: he'll be learning what they mean, what they contain, how to put them on, and how to care for them.

We found a local rabbi (Orthodox, of course) who is expert in this matter, and we figured that, while we'd ask him for help getting Gabe outfitted, we'd also have my tefillin checked to be sure they're kosher. I'm told this is something that should be done regularly. Once a decade does not count as "regularly."

Earlier this week, the rabbi called me to inform me that the parchment in my tefillin were not written according to halakha (Jewish law) and that I should seriously consider getting new parchment for them. Cost: around $200. Alternately, I could buy a new set of tefillin, but he insisted that this was not necessary and that he felt it was his ethical and moral obligation not to sell me anything I did not need or want. Oh, and by the way: those would run anywhere from $200 to north of $500.

The rabbi scanned the parchment of my tefillin and e-mailed it to me. To the naked and uneducated eye, there's nothing wrong with these tefillin. And yet I'm troubled:

  • Why would one of the Chicago Jewish community's most venerable stores sell a set of tefillin that weren't kosher?
  • How -- if at all -- has it changed my life, and my prayer, my meditation, my spiritual growth -- to have been wearing these tefillin?
  • The way things have evolved, we are divided into denominations, but trust only the Orthodox to determine the ritual fitness of our kitchens, our phylacteries, the ritual accoutrements of Judaism. Does it have to be this way?
  • While I understand that there are people who make their living creating these objects and upholding these standards, it seems that the costs mean that you simply couldn't lead a very observant life and be considered a good Jew (by the people preoccupied with making those distinctions). Does it have to be that way?
  • Is the imperfection of my tefillin a symbol of all that's imperfect in my spiritual life? A symptom of my ignorance -- or, perhaps, a cause? Do these tiny flaws open gaps in the space-time fabric that warp my entire experience?
  • When my tefillin are made kosher, I'll struggle with them just the same. The words -- the order, the kind of ink, the kind of parchment, the care taken -- will be the same, or nearly so. I will struggle to put them on and take them off without doing mortal harm to myself, just as I do now. But will I be a better Jew?
  • What will have changed?

--T.A.

The Amba-Anchoress Book-Meme

Me True Ann-Sister tagged me to participate in this meme, via the Anchoress.

The instructions are:

1. Pick up the nearest book ( of at least 123 pages).
2. Open the book to page 123.
3. Find the fifth sentence.
4. Post the next three sentences.
5. Tag five people.

The nearest shelf to my computer has a collection of Buddhist and Jewish texts that are all at arms' length. The biggest one, and the one directly to my left, was Jeffrey Hopkins' gigantic tome, Meditation on Emptiness. Hilariously, page 123 of this 1,017-page book ends after three sentences.

Directly next to it is The Emptiness of Emptiness, C.W. Huntington, Jr.'s introduction to the early Indian Madhyamika philosophy. Here are the meme-required sentences:

It is an axiomatic principle of Candrakirti's text, and of all Madhyamika philosophy, that through immediate and uninterrupted awareness of the emptiness or "suchness" of everyday experience the bodhisattva finds liberation from suffering now -- in this life and in this world. The bodhisattva is a being who has awakened to the emptiness of all things, and what is called the thought of awakening is the growing  non-inferential awareness of this profound dimension of freedom hidden in the inescapable web of our natural interpretations and associated observational languages. A bodhisattva recognizes that the objects and beings populating the world, and the concepts and percepts [my note: it is percepts, not "precepts"] through which they and all possible experience take shape, do not possess self-contained meaning or structure, and that everyday life is simply the totality of relations obtaining between these empty dichotomies.

Whew.

I'm now supposed to tag five people. Not sure if there are five bloggers who stop by regularly, but here goes:

  1. Charles Martin
  2. Alison Bolen
  3. Avi Unger, founder of Jews By Choice
  4. Seth Chalmer
  5. Leah of Accidentally Jewish

Have fun!

--T.A.

What I'm Grumpy About

  • Missed opportunities.
  • People who think they have you completely figured out when they find out who you voted for.
  • Coverage of the markets. Clearly, the news media smells blood, and has been mildly disappointed by the momentary upswings of last week. When it's bad, it's a "bloodbath." When it goes up, it's a "roller coaster ride," or investors are getting "whipsawed."
  • How expensive it is to be Jewish. What a racket.
  • Feeling like I'm constantly being interrupted, even though I'm usually not doing anything.
  • The odds that the White Sox will be any better this year than last.
  • The cost of Super Bowl ads, which have to be quite similar to the cost of eradicating a major disease on some continent or other. How about a game with no ads, and all ad money donated to the cause?
  • The weather. Friends from Dallas were in. They looked at the black, scarred snowbanks and said, "Jeez, if you're going to live in weather like this, don't you at least want some mountains around?!"
  • A sharp increase in my awareness of the passage of time, which brings with it a certain low-level panic, akin to the feeling you get when you get into an elevator, press a button, the door closes -- and for a long moment, nothing happens.
  • The fact that, when Gabe gets me to chase him, I can't catch him anymore.
  • I'm very, very grumpy about our political landscape. I suppose the fact that both the Democratic and Republican presidential races are wide open is a good thing, but I have a feeling that we'll suffer for a few decades yet, thanks to the current Administration, and whoever wins the election may not be equal to the near-impossible task.
  • It's Sunday.
  • Too much time with the in-laws.
  • Missed opportunities. Oh, did I say that already?

--T.A.

Middle Daughter Has a Cold; Oldest Daughter is a Grownup

Last night, the One True Wife was at the opera, and Gabe and I were having our typical bachelor evening, which consists of dinner in front of the TV, and wrestling and throwing things at each other during the commercials (he was also, apparently, studying for a test. Yeah, right).

The phone rang. It was Middle Daughter, sounding stuffed up and melancholy. She is in India, and she has a cold.

She can't run down to Walgreen's to get decongestants. She can't have Mommy make her some soup. She can't curl up on the couch with Gabe and watch something inappropriate on a DVD or the Comedy Channel.

No, she's off having the kind of adventure every young person should have: taking a year between high school and college to see the world while doing volunteer work. And she's learning, among other things, how to take care of herself.

Meanwhile, on Saturday, Oldest Daughter turns 21. She's all about adulthood now: about making a living, and making a name for herself. I hope she doesn't forget to enjoy being young.

Gabe has taken to watching old videos of him as a toddler, and marveling out how his sisters treated him as part brother, part Teddy Ruxpin. He misses them. He feels like an only child now.

More children are out of the question. Gabe would love a dog. A dog would be great, but the One True Wife's one major flaw is a severe allergy to absolutely anything with four legs and fur. I know, I know: there are hypoallergenic breeds. We've exposed to her all of them; they all make her sick, within hours.

So Gabe and I and Spike the African fat-tailed gekko reside in our various cubes, and stay under our warming lights, and slowly give in to the passage of time, while the women move out into the world. We wait for them to come home.

--T.A.

Dukkha vs. Tsuris

My friend Charles Martin has a compelling look at the Buddhist concept of dukkha, the omnipresent suffering and unsatisfactoriness that is "at the root of the four noble truths," according to the Shamhala Dictionary of Buddhism and Zen.

Charles can be forgiven for calling me both a Buddhist and a Jew -- I no longer consider myself the former -- but in his excellent explorations of the Dharma, and especially dukkha, he calls my interpretation of the difference between the two "wrong" -- well, thanks, Charlie, for causing me more tsuris. Right in the middle of all this dukkha, that's the last thing I need.

Actually, Charlie originally asked me to explore the similarities and differences between dukkha and tsuris, that great Yiddish word for suffering (I love that Charlie even asked the question).

Here's what I said to him, in an e-mail:

Tsuris is to dukkha as irritable bowel syndrome is to amoebic dysentery. For some reason, Yiddish (at least those words that have seeped into the modern Western vernacular) just isn't set up to communicate profound concepts or deep emotions. Dukkha, as I understand it, has to do with an inherent disequilibrium in life -- an inability be freed from the suffering that comes from clinging.

Tsuris, on the other hand, is about aggravation. Something that's vexing you at the moment. While Jews are never without this emotional baggage, the word
tsuris itself doesn't convey some lasting, inherent unsatisfactoriness, the way dukkha does. It's more a pain in the butt that you hope will go away.

Pretty interesting: within these two words, you can see the difference between the two religious traditions (and the myriad cultures that adhere to them) pretty clearly.

So, Charlie, I wasn't talking only about dukkha representing "Big Stuff."  I was talking about dukkha representing the inherent nature of suffering, whereas the Jewish view, at least the Ashkenaz view as conveyed in Yiddish, is that suffering is inherent, yes -- but only in my life.

(Why me?!! Oy. Such tsuris.)

Suffering is so central to both Judaism and Buddhism, but the differences in viewpoint could not be more vast, and the differences dwell right in the words. In Buddhism, dukkha is (again quoting Shamhala's dictionary) "everything, both material and mental, that is conditioned, that is subject to arising and passing away, that is comprised of the five skandhas (aggregates, or individual qualities), and that is not in a state of liberation." The Yiddish Dictionary Online merely defines tsuris, however, as "trouble, distress, problem" -- all states that one ardently wishes can and will just go away.

In Judaism, suffering is both omnipresent and targeted; both unavoidable and yet, somehow, from the complainer's perspective, inherently unjust. The Psalms are a great example of lyrical tsuris: King David begs, beseeches, complains, and whines; then, relieved of his tsuris, he thanks, lauds and extols the virtues of a God who can both bestow and banish the kind of suffering that we all experience, but that we (Jews) always hope to be rid of.

Buddhism says it's inherent in merely living. Only through realizing that can we overcome it. That's the Big Stuff, Charlie, that dukkha represents.

Oy. I need a nap.

--T.A.

Living in "The Truman Show"

Last weekend featured yet another trip -- this time, a trip to the Florida Panhandle for a board meeting and a weekend of eating and drinking too much.

Aside from that, the most interesting part of the trip was staying in Watercolor, a new "Traditional Neighborhood Development" adjacent to Seaside, one of the original New Urbanism developments by the pioneering architects Andres Duany and Elizabeth Plater-Zyberk.

Seaside, you may remember, was where The Truman Show was shot, because it's an idyllic but forced meditation on Simpler Times, when automobiles did not run our lives and rule our collective consciousness, and that made it perfect for the movie's message about both reality TV and reality itself. Watercolor, developed more recently (and still under development) on adjacent land, takes Seaside's egalitarian and pedestrian scale and explodes it into multi-million dollar residences, each with its own distinctive style (although held to strict design and buildind codes), each with large screened-in or wrap-around porches; each capacious (from 2,500 to about 5,000 square feet), and none selling for under $700,000.

To run the meticulously meandering gravel jogging paths on a cool January morning, through these deserted neighborhoods of self-conscious Southern manses, is to have fallen into a combination of The Truman Show and To Kill a Mockingbird. You can't be sure if it's Jim Carrey who will stroll by with his Irish Setter, or Boo Radley will be watching you from a darkened porch.

More likely it'll be Carrey, with a no-foam latte from the nearby Starbucks, who'll stop you, talk your ear off about yesterday's stroll on the beach with his adorable children and next week's project to increase the value of his home, and vanish into the mist.

Good to be home.

--T.A.

Random stuff I just wanted to share, all crammed into one post

  • My brother has written a novel! And gotten it published! I've bought 15 copies -- one for me, 14 for the only people I know who aren't related to me and still speak to me. I'm sure that if they stop speaking to me, my brother's writing won't be at fault.
  • I've had an essay published in this book. A pretty interesting book, if you're into that sort of thing.
  • Charles Martin explores Buddhism (and some other things) in a revived blog that I'm sure will be worth reading. So I've added it to my Best of Blogolalia list.
  • Rabbi Daniel Landes, co-founder and director of the PARDES Institute, a renowned multi-denominational center of Jewish study in Jerusalem, coined a phrase that I'm going to have made into bumper stickers: Jews for Exegesis.
  • He also invoked the Talmud as proof that Jews of radically different backgrounds could speak to each other -- even across centuries and continents. So why are Jews of different backgrounds having so much trouble speaking to each other today?, he asked.
  • Here's a doctor who says the only way to level the athletic playing field is to permit and regulate steroid use. He's been called "the loneliest man on the planet." And far worse.
  • That Airborne stuff actually works.
  • Hardest things I've ever done: 1) Meditate 2) Be a step-parent 3) Go onstage as Banquo's ghost, during a high-school matinee, drenched in chocolate syrup (it looks like blood under stage lights), and wearing only white body paint and a G-string. I think the director had it in for me. I looked like a sundae with legs.
  • Funniest thing Gabe ever said: "Why is Uncle Dick named after a private part?"
  • Middle Daughter is off on her journey to save the world again. She's the "World Traveler" on the family blog-roll.
  • Oldest Daughter has an intimidating internship with the Federal District of this outfit.
  • I haven't the slightest idea who I'm going to vote for in my state's primary. Tell me: who's fiscally conservative, understands the gravity and staying power of the threat from radical Islamic terror, recognizes that working men and women have their backs to the wall as never before, and knows what to do about it; has the guts, and the brains, to address health insurance, immigration, housing, and begin to revive our crappy reputation and foreign policy, without being beholden to special corporate or religious interests; and has the brains, the political capital and the respect necessary to assemble a top-flight Cabinet? And who isn't a TOTAL CREEP?!
  • If I were Donovan McNabb, I wouldn't want to finish my career before I had the chance to flatten Terrell Owens before a national television audience.
  • And if I saw Roger Clemens, I'd offer him this.

--T.A.

Ancient Mariner turns 90

My dad got up last Monday, looked at the paper, and couldn't believe it: January 7, 2008, his 90th birthday.

All day long, the phone rang: grandsons and granddaughters (all 12 of them), old colleagues and (very) old friends checked in to wish him well.

He had his wife of 65+ years by his side, all six of his kids, three of their spouses, one granddaughter, and a metric ton of food from a very good Middle Eastern restaurant in nearby Naples.

And all day long, he shook his head and laughed at his good fortune. For all eight of us to be together, in 80-degree weather, in the very house in which we'd all spent so much formative and restorative time, was such a blessing that it seemed like a joke, or a sitcom, or an episode of This Is Your Life.

The invisible presences were almost as tangible as the rest of us: his dear brother, killed in training to be a Navy fighter pilot during World War II; old friends (Ned, Grant, Irv, Betsy), housekeepers (Rose, Rebecca, Gladys, Ruth, Norah), pets (Joy, Shoonka, Zorro, Sapa, Ginger), pests (you know who you are), and neighbors (Mr. Creech, Mr. Fleishacker; the Freeses, Turners, Langendorfs, Lutterbecks, Levis and more) who colored our lives.

His Florida neighbors have bestowed upon him the nickname (or title) "Director of Sunsets," because each evening around sundown, he's out on the beach with a glass of Jack Daniels, doing the work of guiding the Sun over the horizon. It's a tough job, but someone's gotta do it. And on the night before his birthday, with 50 or so friends and family in attendance, the Sun, the horizon and my dad put on a truly stunning show, a multicolored, panoramic, Cecil B. DeMille production that confounded and delighted us all. Florida and my old man at their best.

My father is no stranger to death. He doesn't run from it and won't complain when it comes knocking. But on this weekend, he was so alive, so present, and so vigorous; and we were all so glad to be in each others' presence (and so relieved to be able to irritate each other the way only family members can), that it beggars description (and defies photography, though there are some very good ones here). I just wanted to tell you, from a week's remove, how great it was.

Here's to the Old Man. Long may he wave.

--T.A.

Georgia Hiker • Election Center 2008 • Crisis in Kenya • Britney Spears

Those are the main topics offered just under the banner on CNN's home page.

I can suggest a few more:

  • Lower IQs
  • Bigger waistlines
  • Filler and Fluff
  • Annoying Stuff
  • All that and less --

Right Here!

--T.A.

Orthodox institution to ordain women as rabbis

David Hartman, founder of the Hartman Institute and a formidable scholar and teacher, has announced a plan to begin a four-year rabbinic training program that will train people of both sexes to become rabbis of all Jewish denominations. He and his son Donniel -- a phenomenal teacher in his own right --will open the program next year.

This is an enormous moment in the ongoing evolution of Judaism, painful and ingrown though it sometimes may be. And it's one of the few that will be seen as a significant milestone 50 years from now. This is because the Hartman Institute is (a) in Jerusalem, the seat of ultra-Orthodoxy, and (b) an institution renowned for its scholarship.

Hartman's ambitious program recognizes that "[f]or too long now we have been robbing ourselves of 50 percent of our potential leaders; people who can shape and inspire others," and that "[t]he classic distinctions between men and women are no longer relevant."

There is already strong (though measured) reaction against this plan by leaders of Modern Orthodoxy, who claim that scholarly women are honored in a way unique to women, and that by removing the distinctions between men and women, women will be (further) diminished.

One important aspect of this plan is its intent to educate Jews of different denominations side by side. Another is that training will emphasize teaching skills, hoping to prepare "master educators" for teaching posts in North American high schools.

Hartman is recognizing and acting on truths that the Jewish community, as a whole, has been reluctant to embrace:

  • We are all one people.
  • Women frequently constitute the center, the very heart of both the Jewish family (and its spiritual values and literacy), and the Jewish community (and they constitute a majority of the teachers in Jewish schools).
  • Judaism faces urgent challenges that cannot bow to denominational pressures.
  • We need more good teachers.

Read all about it.

(H/T: Avi at Jews By Choice)

Shabbat Shalom!

--T.A.

Most Recent Photos

  • Damaschke Field
  • All Star Village
  • Cooperstown
  • Chevy-Volt-Concept-07
  • DSCN3957
  • Hillary
  • Aaron-burr-350
  • Farm
  • Gabe and Calusa 2002
  • 200pxabraham_abulafia
  • Black_rhino
  • Moshijog